A look at the dangers of compromising aims when dealing with the controlled narrative of public opinion. The first part of the transcript of the show is included below
Listen to the show here:
State Actors Lying for a Living
The facts of the matter are the only antidote to a stream of lies.
The insertion of half truths to pacify those who consider themselves to be cynical of the party line makes this group of waiverers easy to manipulate. The term “limited hangout” describes a gate keeping organisation which absorbs the energy of those who may be questioning an official narrative but are still being manipulated. This type of operation is run by gatekeepers who maintain strict limitations on the topics debated and introduce distraction issues.These types of groups also get the participants arguing amongst each other over issues of mainly no importance. This method has been very successful with gatekeeping and directing the 9 11 “truth” debate.
Over the years I have seen these gatekeepers come and go. The main point here is that once you compromise something which is true and allow other points of view to come in and manipulate the outcome, which is what in effect happens to every group, especially those which might have some effect. In this situation you may as well be telling all lies as any misinformation outside what is absolutely true poisons the well completely. Whether it is those who spout a bit about common law and birth certificates and then miss the point entirely in court cases or those who get on the bandwagon of a cause and somehow think that the state will allow what they are doing to continue without interference.
These types have one thing in common, they always fail.
The biggest narcissists get listened to though and they actually appear to be gaining ground, then it all falls apart. There is an antidote to all this and it is to work in groups of two or three people. The idea that the public could now demand a real citizens assembly is an idea which is unincorporated and has no leader. It is a lobbying tool which if used effectively could be a lot of fun and pull the rug from the subversives controlling the public.
Along with this the appeal to authority as an argument no longer has standing in the eyes of the public, which makes the exposing of propaganda and lies in the manipulation of public opinion much more difficult. When most reiterated statements on behalf of the state have little or no standing, the truth can look so outlandish the public cannot believe that truth because the lies are so audacious.
The professional liars or agents of change infest all public office. State actors lying for a living, even those who appear to oppose the state are the state as we have so often discussed, most recently in the case of the absurd and totalitarian Extinction Rebellion.
Exaggerated Sea Level Rise is Fake News
I did an interview with leading sea level expert and IPCC author Nils Axl Morner. The subject was the agenda lead computer modelling of the IPCC and why Nils had stopped being a contributor to their AR reports which drive global policy. This was covered in the show:
https://windowsontheworld.net/sea-level-rise-fake-news/
Here is the paper referred to from Nils Axl Morner about the failings of the UN IPCC:
Here is the article and video about the 5G “moratorium” giving the public lip service and the facts about a lying Somerset council;
Disgraced UK Council Cant stop Lying
Here is a mission statement for small groups taking on local councils:
We are an unaffiliated group of local residents concerned about the lack of democratic process in local government planning and policy.
We will remain unaffiliated as individuals acting collectively and within the law towards a truly
inclusive democratic process where all voices are heard.
We are not affiliated with any group or organisation whatsoever.
This does not mean that we do or do not endorse other groups.
We do not agree with arriving at a “Consensus” through being steered into predetermined outcomes by trained facilitators either working for the council or public/private partnerships.
We deem this to be against the public interest and an affront to democracy.
