George Hunt and The Globalist Warming Action Plan
Show notes and links for patrons of Windows on the World
Video with remastered audio:
Show Link:
The planning of societal change takes place decades before the public see any signs of the implementation. By this time it is being sold to them in the form of a benefit.
The public are not excluded from looking for these ongoing plans but they are not looking for them so do not look for and do not see the signs of change.
Most will never be able to see the plans behind these changes as they believe the cover story.
The change has to be brought about on the back of something which appears beneficial to the public.
The public then accept the change as necessary or for the “common good”. They are guilt tripped into accepting
loss of rights and benefits through basic propaganda tools.
A good example is “Well I pay my taxes, why dont you?
This is group think, the hive mind which then demonises anything outside the controlled accepted narrative. Fear of being singled out keeps the flock in line. Now you are called a denier, a right wing extremist, or conspiracy theorist.
These terms now have no meaning but are used to smear opposition.
The societal structure of power implements this through the executive, judicial and administrative arms if governance.
Interested and promoted lobbyists exploit this for their own advantage and indirectly the advantage of the state.
This is the basis of how society works in the present technocratic age.
An “Alchemical” concept for business
The blending of Fire and Water comes from the Freemasonic and Rosicrucian concept of Caine , Abel and Set.
The sons of Caine are Fire, the sons of Abel are water as are the sons of Set.
In 1987 Edmond De Rothschild at The World Wilderness Congress described the Banks as being the Fire to bring the concept of Development to the Enviromentalism.
The water of Conservation on the other hand brought about this synthesis of fire and water. An “alchemical” mix but in reality a brilliant business plan which was to be the wrapper for Global Governance.
The inciting document for the “Globalist Warming” business plan for the world was a book called “Our Common Future” which laid out the implementation of the global project.
Our Common Future, 1987 a publication from The World Commission on Environment and Development
The World Commission on Environment and Development, headed by Gro Harlem Brundtland, Prime Minister of Norway, was set up as an independent body in 1983 by the United Nations.
Its brief was to re-examine the critical environment, to develop proposals to solve them, and to ensure that human progress will be sustained through development without bankrupting the resources of future generations. In Our Common Future, the Commission serves notice that the time has come for a marriage of economy and ecology, so that governments and their people can take responsibility not just for environmental damage, but for the policies that cause the damage. It is not too late to change these policies; but, it warns, we must act now.
Extracts from the text:
Most of today’s decision makers will be dead before the planet suffers the full consequences of acid rain, global warning, ozone depletion, widespread desertification, and species loss. Most of today’s young voters, however, will be alive.
In this, perhaps the most important document of the decade on the future of the world, the urgency of changing certain policy decisions, some of which threaten the very survival of the human race, is made abundantly clear.
Some Quotes from Our Common Future:
Ensuring a sustainable level of population
Re orientating technology and managing risk.
Merging environment and economics in decision making.
The UN enviromental programme UNEP should be strengthened as the principal source on enviromental data, assessment and agent for change and international cooperation on critical enviroment and national resource protection issues.
UNEP’s Earthwatch programme should be the centre of leadership to the UN system on risk assessment.
A new international programme for co operation among largely non governmental organizations, scientific bodies and industry groups should therefore be established for the purpose.
Making difficult choices will depend on widespread public support and invlovement of an informed public, NGO.s, scientific community and industry.
The World Bank is presently re orientating its programmes towards greater environmental concerns. This should be accompanied by a fundamental commitment to sustainable development by the bank.
It is also essential that the regional development banks and the IMF incorporate similar objectives in their policies and programmes.
The changes in human attitudes that we call for depend on a vast campaign of education, debate and public participation.
We cannot discuss environment or development without discussing political development.
There MUST be more redistribution of power.
How are individuals in the real world to be persuaded or made to act in the common interest?
The answer lies partly in education, institutional development and law enforcement
Most important, effective participation in decision making processes by local communities can help them articulate and effectively enforce the common interest.
See also: OUR GLOBAL NEIGHBOURHOOD 1996 – You Tube video: ENABLERS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE 2019
Following the document and action plan laid out in “Our Common Future” and the World Wilderness Congress was The Rio Earth Summit 1992 / UNCED (United Nation conference on environment and development) brought about by Maurice Strong through the UN.
In 1987 a man called George Hunt found himself at the World Wilderness Congress.
George Hunt died Dec 23rd 2013
In his testimony he said:
I am educating the public to understand that a secret bank was set in motion by international financier Edmond de Rothschild.
The bank will eventually be the only bank to exist as banks merge with one another into a larger bank.
As the large and small banks topple toward large banks, where will it stop?
The ultimate bank may be the Bank privee Edmond de Rothschild which was created in Geneva, Switzerland,
a month after the aforementioned UNCED Wilderness Congress was held. It is presently known as the World Conservation Bank.
The bank will promote conservation but judge the hypocrisy of UNCED’s Maurice Strong, Rothschild’s right hand,
as he brazenly attempts to circumvent Colorado water laws and ruin valuable farmlands.
Maurice Strong had purchesed a huge ranch in Colorado called the Baca, where he and his wife Hanne held new age and multi faith ceremonies heralding a new world order and religion. Strong was exposed by George Hunt as trying to privatise the water supply of the approx 200,000 acre ranch.
Hunt stated in 1987: The bank utilizes the media to spread environment fears too.
Spreading these fears will justify monstrous, inoperative, greenhouse effect projects for the greedy rich and fat contracts.
Some scientists have stated that they have serious questions concerning the lack of scientific methods and false or inadequate presumptions may
have been used in the environment studies.
Maurice Strong stated that there is “no better person” to spearhead this project than Edmond de Rothschild, and that he “epitomizes in his own
life that positive synthesis between environment and conservation on the one hand and economics on the other”.
In other words,
Rothschild is the leader of both international finance and this pseudo-environmentalist movement resting on the two pillars –
the claim of anthropogenic global warming and that of population control
Of course, the Rothschilds were making massive amounts of money from this. They are the leaders in the carbon trading market, according to this press release:
But as this presentation shows, their intentions are not only to make massive amounts of money, but also to ensnare the populace within a new web of social control.
We can see the outlines of this operating today. Of relevance is the document called “Trading Emissions: Full Global Potential” (London: The Social Market Foundation, document – written by Simon Linnett, Executive Vice Chairman of N M Rothschild, London
Carbon Trading Emissions – Full Global Potential
In the document, he defined “greenhouse emissions” as the new form of “social market” and stated:
“That such a market has to be established on a world basis coordinated by an international institution with a constitution to match.…
That, perhaps, it might be regarded as having wider benefits than merely `saving the planet’ – perhaps it might be the basis of a new world order, one that is not based on trade and/or conflict resolution.
Perhaps one can see a way to achieve this goal through leadership, vision and some marginal and manageable renunciation of national sovereignty, how the world might just get there.
Implicit in all the above is that nations have to be prepared to subordinate, to a certain extent, some element of their sovereignty to this world initiative.”
He stated that regulating this should be a “World Environment Authority” operating from a “world city with world skills and world facilities.”
He then notes, in a section entitled “A natural role for London”, “London is a world financial centre (possibly “the” world financial centre).”
and that “London would make a compelling case to house the World Environmental Agency.”
The leaders of this movement advocate tyrannical World Government and mass depopulation.
The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, “Limits to Growth” was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979,
but insufficient progress had been made in population reduction.
Then in 1991, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider was published:
“Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, “new enemies must be identified.”[2] “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself”
The Club of Rome stated:
Given global instabilities, including those of the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and resources, is absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world population, according to the mid-1970’s recommendation of the Draper Fund, must be immediately affected.
“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions
in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing.
This must be done by whatever means necessary. …
Compulsory cooperation s not debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist “cultures” and lacking the appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate only means delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.
The Global 2000 report to the President, prepared by the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of State
The report begins as a STUDY for the “PROBABLE CHANGES IN THE WORLD’S POPULATION, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE END OF THE CENTURY.” The report concludes that the stresses are already severe enough to deny many millions of people basic needs for food, shelter, health, and jobs, or ANY HOPE for betterment. At the same time, the earth’s carrying capacity – the ability of biological systems to provide resources for human needs – is eroding.
In July of 1980, Secretary of State endorsed as official Carter administration policy the Global 2000 report, which according to then Secretary of State Edmund Muskie’s own words “THE ELIMINATION OF 2 billion human beings by the year… 2000. The Office of Population Affairs of the U.S. State Department from the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population policy, U.S. Foreign Policy is being planned and implemented on the basis of its effectiveness in murdering human beings.
The lending policies of the World Bank, under Global 2000 supporter, Robert McNamara, have been designed to force African nations NOT to develop irrigation or any advance farming techniques but to rely on labor intensive low technologies.
…The Security Council of the UN, led by the Anglo-American Major Nation Powers, will decree that, henceforth, all nations have quotas for REDUCTION on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, food, medicine or military force, when required. …
As part of the ongoing plan for centralized control it was also stated that outmoded notions of sovereignty will be discarded and the Security Council has complete legal, military and economic jurisdiction in any region in the world, to be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council.
“The Security Council of the U.N. Will explain that not all races are equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on sufferance that they cooperate with the Security Council. …
All could be lost if opposition by minor races is tolerated and the vacillations of those we work with, our closest comrades, is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution.”
Incidentally The next World Wilderness Congress called Wild 11 is in 2020 in India and will take control of 50 percent of the Earths land and seas through the UN.
The 11th World Wilderness Congress is an essential milestone on the way to the historic 2020 decision in China.
WILD 11’s goal is two-fold:
1) to influence the global decision-making process and create new leadership, so we seize this critical moment in history.
2) Take the ambitious and necessary step of agreeing to protect and interconnect at least 50% of Earth’s land and seas.
Launching a BRICS-based (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) leadership committee and in-country social movements to influence policy agendas in some of the world’s largest and most biodiverse countries.
“The Survival Challenge”: A formal declaration signed by leaders from all sectors of society and all corners of the planet, calling for the United Nations to end the Sixth Extinction by protecting half of Earth, outlining what is expected from the world’s leaders.
The background of George Hunt
George Washington Hunt served as a naval officer on cruisers and destroyers, held corporate positions for eight years, and worked as an entrepreneur in the health industry. He taught small business management and accounting as an adjunct professor at a college level for five years and started a health corporation in 1991 which became very profitable. He then sold it and retired as of 2009.
He was also a dedicated conservationist and in turn lost a career business because he stood up for nature.
Mr. Hunt is here to inform every one of the concept of The Big Bad Bank it is ready for implementation
whenever the directors feel the right time occurs, probably after all the world’s currency systems fail and there is chaos everywhere.
It is presently called the World Conservation Bank but may open in the name of the United Nations or as a private Rothschild Bank
The bank will replace all banks. There will be one big bank. It will issue the world currency, make loans and finance huge conservation programs.
Its power will be great. It could bring any nation to its knees just by adjustments to credit and currency.
The name of the bank is not that important as the world bank heads the whole operation.
We now have the Global Enviromental Facility which formed after the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
In this audio Mr Hunt relates how he got into the conference in 1987 in this interview from 14th Jan 2010
Check out AUDIO 1 In our show “The Man who saw the future”.
This event was where Earth Charter co-author Maurice Strong, introduced his friend, Edmund de Rothschild,
Edmond De Rothschild introduced CO2 as the cause of man-made global warming.
CO2, therefore, had to be caught at the poles and transported away in order to lower warm arctic/antarctic temperatures, and perhaps dumped in the Sahara. He suggested dry ice be sprayed at the the poles to cool them down. This was accepted with hushed silence by the conference attendees.
This was then accepted without discussion at the UN Rio Summit in 1992!
Edmond De Rothschild can be heard on video stating, “This needs money!”
1992 Earth Summit – Cobden Papers
Mr Rothschild knows about money it is his business.
The administrator of the New Global Financial system is:
The Global Environmental Facility
The WORLD BANK IS TRUSTEE, In other worlds it carries out the wishes of the GEF.
Website: https://www.thegef.org/
The GEF administers several trust funds and provides secretariat services, on an interim basis, for the Adaptation Fund. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) Trust Fund was established on the eve of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, to help tackle our planet’s most pressing environmental problems.
GEF funding to support the projects is contributed by donor countries. These financial contributions are replenished every four years (see GEF Replenishment documents) by the 39 GEF donor countries.
GEF funds are available to developing countries and countries with economies in transition to meet the objectives of the international environmental conventions and agreements.
The World Bank serves as the GEF Trustee, administering the GEF Trust Fund (contributions by donors). The Trustee helps mobilize GEF resources; disburses funds to GEF Agencies; prepares financial reports on investments and use of resources; and monitors application of budgetary and project funds. The Trustee creates periodic reports that contain an array of fund-specific financial in formation.
The GEF has several key roles to play under the Paris Agreement.
The GEF serves as part of the financial mechanism of the Agreement, which also established a process for ensuring that all actions on climate change are fully transparent with a mechanism for helping countries meet that goal.
The GEF’s climate change mitigation strategy, which is financed through the GEF Trust Fund, supports developing countries as they make transformational shifts towards low emission development pathways with three fundamental objectives:
Promoting innovation and technology transfer for sustainable energy breakthroughs
Demonstrating mitigation options with systemic impacts, by strengthening interaction and integration between climate change mitigation and the other
GEF focal areas
Mainstreaming mitigation concerns into sustainable development strategies through the continuous support of enabling conditions in developing countries.
The GEF’s climate change adaptation strategy, which is financed through the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), aims at supporting developing countries to move to a climate resilient development pathway while reducing exposure to the immediate risks posed by climate change. The GEF adaptation strategy hinges upon three main pillars:
Reduce vulnerability and increase resilience through innovation and technology transfer for adaptation
Mainstream adaptation and resilience for systemic impact
Foster enabling conditions for effective and integrated adaptation.
All our projects and programs can be consulted in our database for detailed descriptions of activities and results.
Madrid, Spain skyline at Santa Maria la Real de La Almudena Cathedral and the Royal Palace
Events
GEF-funded projects have had a tangible impact on climate change:
Reducing the vulnerability of almost 27 million people in more than 130 countries
Supporting nearly 1,000 climate change mitigation projects expected to contribute 8.4 billion tons of direct and indirect GHG emission reductions over time.
Looking Ahead
Under GEF-7, the GEF will continue to foster the shift to a low-carbon economy by supporting creative thinking and innovative financing. The GEF’s efforts are structured to address the key decisions for the Paris Agreement, and to further support climate action in developing countries. The framework is aligned with the GEF’s innovative project designs, proven track record of support for technology transfer, and ability to attract private sector co-financing.
The establishment and operationalization of the Green Climate Fund has added to the evolving context in which the GEF operates. The GEF-7 Climate Change Focal Area Strategy is complementary to programming by the Green Climate Fund and other climate funds and lays the foundation for enhanced climate action by harnessing synergies across the different focal areas and building on the GEF’s record of driving innovation.
Lets look at the Real Objectives:
The purpose of the Facility is to lend money to the poorest countries, ‘money’ printed by the IMF out of thin air and guaranteed by our governments.
The Facility seeks wilderness areas rich in minerals as security. The idea is that GEF money then flows back to reimburse our governments for loans.
When a country cannot repay loans to the GEF it must give up a piece of its territory to the Rothschild banks (GEF, IMF, World Bank). The total amount of land involved can be as much as 30% of the Earth’s surface.
If land cannot be offered as collateral, the country must starve (Haiti, Argentina and others). Rothschild’s stroke of genius was that he had his GEF smuggled into the UN system at the Rio UN Summit in 1992 by his friend, Maurice Strong. Thus, high-ranking ministerial officials from 179 countries are practically co-opted onto the council of the bank, thereby endorsing Rothschild’s theft of the world!
The GEF is to manage the money which was promised to the developing countries at Copenhagen (100 billion dollars a year from 2020 – 30 billion over the next 3 years) with the help of the World Bank.
The establishment and operationalization of the Green Climate Fund has added to the evolving context in which the GEF operates. The GEF-7 Climate Change Focal Area Strategy is complementary to programming by the Green Climate Fund and other climate funds and lays the foundation for enhanced climate action by harnessing synergies across the different focal areas and building on the GEF’s record of driving innovation.
Established in 1991, the GEF is today the largest funder of projects to improve the global environment. The GEF has allocated $8.8 billion, supplemented by more than $38.7 billion in co-financing, for more than 2,400 projects in more than 165 developing countries.
The GEF partnership includes 10 agencies:
The United Nations Development Program (David Rothschild consultant/Nigeria)
The UN Environment Program (UNEP)
The World Bank
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (A Rockefeller-partner organization)
The UN Industrial Development Organization
The African Development Bank
The Asian Development Bank
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
The Inter-American Development Bank (David Rothschild consultant)
The International Fund for Agricultural Development
Here is how it works:
The Telegraph 2 Jan 2010:
NM Rothschild is poised to earn tens of millions of pounds… [by] further strengthening the close bond between the Rothschild family and Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, the bank advising (Deripaska’s firm) Rusal.
Deripaska (an intimate friend of Nathan Rothschild’s) was able to tap the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (GEF) for a loan of $150m, to his Basic Element vehicle in 2006.
Deripaska is one of 16 global business leaders who drafted CEO Climate Policy Recommendations to G8 Leaders, a document outlining international business community’s proposals to effectively tackle global warming’.
The decision to make the GEF an independent organization enhanced the involvement of developing countries in the decision-making process and in implementation of the projects. Since 1994, however, the World Bank has served as the Trustee of the GEF Trust Fund and provided administrative services.
As part of the restructuring, the GEF was entrusted to become the financial mechanism for both,
the UN Convention on Biological Diversity
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
The GEF started funding projects that enable the Russian Federation and nations in Eastern Europe and Central Asia to phase out their use of ozone-destroying chemicals.
GEF projects in climate change help developing countries and economies in transition to contribute to the overall objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and sustainability (UNFCCC).
As the financial mechanism of the UNFCCC, GEF allocates and disburses about $250 million.
The GEF supports projects in:
1. Climate Change Mitigation
2. Climate Change Adaptation
Food Crisis and the Global ‘Land grab’
Rothschild’s vested interests – as uttered by his henchmen, George Soros, Rothschild-agent – recently became the largest shareholder in Adecoagro one of the leading agribusiness companies in South America.
Jim Rogers (Soros/Rothschild’s Quantum partner, which broke the Bank of England in 1992 and forced South East Asian currencies to devaluate sharply):
“I’m convinced that farmland is going to be one of the best investments of our time. Lord Jacob Rothschild thinks that right now is an excellent point of entry for taking a long-term position in agriculture.”
Rothschild invested $36 million for a 24% stake in Agrifirma Brazil.
Lord Jacob Rothschild has bought 100,000 acres in Brazil -and holds an option on another 60,000 acres. Rothschild has recently formed a co-operation agreement with Rabobank.
The agreement covers co-operation for mergers and acquisitions and the equity capital market across a number of sectors including farm inputs and equipment, farm-based commodities, food processing and beverages.
3 Jan. 2010:
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) estimates that globally 15 to 20 million hectares (an area the size of Uruguay) have been under negotiation since 2006. Big buyers are China, Daewoo, South Korea, Saudi Arabia – in particular in Africa, this leaving the Africans with even less food at their disposal. There have been riots against it in Madagascar and Kenya.
10 June 2010:
In the spring of 2008 spiking grain prices caused food shortages and rioting in dozens of countries before falling some 50% by December.
Over the past few years hedge fund gurus like George Soros, investment powerhouses like Black Rock, and retirement plan giants like TIAA-CREF [Abel Danger forensics alleges that TIAA-CREF pension funds were invested in infrastructure related to 9/11] have begun to plow money into farmland – everywhere from the Midwest to Ukraine to Brazil.
Conclusion
Rothschild established the CO2 theory as fact at the 4th World Wilderness Congress in 1987
“It needs money”, he said. In Rio 1992 his friend Maurice Strong ensured that Rothschild’s plan GEF Bank became UN policy. Mr. Rothschild is making himself the world’s leading CO2 trader now. Edmond De Rothschild grabs land. He uses it for food-speculation and prospecting for and extraction of minerals. In Haiti, before the earthquake, people could not even afford to buy humble mud pies because the price of food doubled – as a consequence of the production of bio-fuel because of Edmund de Rothschild’s unscrupulous but very profitable concept of CO2 driving global warming. .
How the failure in Copenhagen must vex Rothschild. It could have led to an enforceable definition of his system to make huge profits through increasing CO2 taxes globally which would gradually lead to the ‘world community’s’ ruin, as well as Rothschild becoming the shrouded emperor of the world.
But he has got time. He knows his time is near-after 234 years of hard mole work.
Rich countries committed themselves to provide $30 billion of climate aid over the next three years and $100 billion a year from 2020 to the developing countries. This money is to be paid through The GEF. A brilliant business plan and great return for Rothschild Investment bank.
Globalist Warming is now the official Global Governance control and management system.
The audio clips from the show are attached.
Some more interesting information in covered in the show in this archive document:
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopoliticasp_sociopol_rothschild37.htm
